The Hidden Face of Facebook Part II

From it’s very beginning’s Facebook was touted to be an online haven. Unlike it’s other social counterparts, like MySpace, it had a certain air of saftey. They people we connected with were called, “Friends”. We could control who saw our profile and who was “Friended”.
Unfortunately for us, Facebook pushes the envelope of privacy over a cliff. They use that comfort of saftey against us. In a sense we are giving our information to the very enemy we hope to be protected from.
In November of 2007, Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Facebook, stood before a packed crowd of advertsing executives to unveil a new concept in the ad space. He allowed companies to use the Facebook social graph and to develop highly targeted ads.
Large brands such as Coca-Cola (KO), Sony Pictures (SNE) and Verizon (VZ) have signed on for this effort. Part of the engine powering this new ad system is called Beacon, which takes data from 44 web destinations and mashes it up with Facebook’s internal information to help build more focused advertising messages.
While it seemed to be a briliant concept, a quick review reveals that Beacon might turn out to be a privacy nightmare for the company.
The 44 sites that have partnered with Facebook include everyone from Kongregate, LiveJournal, NYTimes (NYT), Sony Online, Blockbuster (BBI), Bluefly.com, STA Travel, The Knot, TripAdvisor, Travel Ticker, TypePad, viagogo, Vox, Yelp, WeddingChannel.com and Zappos.com.
These partner sites put a little a piece of Facebook javascript on their web site and certain information, cleverly (and innocuously) labeled as a user alert, is sent to Facebook. For instance, Fandago users can publish information about the movies they saw. It all seems like a clever idea because it lets Facebook triangulate your likes and dislikes even more, and deliver more focused ads.
Not everyone was pleased with the announcement. MoveOn.org started a massive campaign against the Beacon service. The website states – “When you buy a book or movie online–or make a political contribution–do you want that information automatically shared with the world on Facebook?”
Less than one month later, Mark Zuckerburg, wrote a post on Facebook’s blog stating, “We’ve made a lot of mistakes building this feature, but we’ve made even more with how we’ve handled them. We simply did a bad job with this release, and I apologize for it.”
As we will see, Facebook does a great job with saying the right things, but they simply do not follow through. In fact Beacon is still a viable product. Check out the FAQ on the Beacon Product.
In the next installment we will provide more information about Facebook’s hidden agenda to exploit it’s users.
This is Part 1 of a series I am doing on Social Media Sites and Privacy.
Seth didn’t mean it. Accidents happen, right? A a good, Christian father I was supposed to realize that immediately. My head was telling me to let it go and give him a big hug so I wouldn’t wound his little ego. I was supposed to say, “It’s just stuff, son. We can always replace it.” 
